Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2007 19:49:33 GMT -5
[quote author=jimmy WHILE ALL THE WHILE, 'BILLY BOY' CLINTON (GET RID OF THAT DRESS MONICA) FIRED EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM (96) WHEN HE CAME INTO OFFICE.? NARY ONE PEEP ABOUT THAT. (DOUBLE STANDARD MAYBE?) YOU BET YOUR SWEET PERTUTTI! THERE IS. JIMMY
jimmy --actually it is common and accepted practice when you take office to clean house and let them all go -- nothing unusual about that -- not a double standard there
[/quote]
|
|
|
Post by pegleg on Oct 4, 2007 1:46:53 GMT -5
jimmy --actually it is common and accepted practice when you take office to clean house and let them all go -- nothing unusual about that -- not a double standard there So, a wholesale cleaning of house, 93 prosecutors, for political purposes, is ok, but selectively replacing 8 (or was it 12?) prosecutors who weren't meeting standards is not? I've not been able to find anything amiss in the firing of those prosecutors. Maybe you could explain the difference? It might help us all to better understand the good intentions of the dem party. If you like, maybe you could go through a few of the cases where you think the replacement of the prosecutors was improper? I'm definitely interested in understanding this better from the dem perpsective. BTW, I agree that one of the BIG mistakes Bush made when he came into office was his attempt at bi-partisanship by keeping on too many clinton appointees. Huge mistakes, at the FBI, CIA, Justice, etc.
|
|