BAIL SET FOR O.J.

[Joan]

Bail set for O.J. at $125,000. Also, has to surrender his passport and cannot have contact with any witnesses, etc. Can travel within the U.S. Thought the bail was too low.

Hearing will be the 3rd week of October.

[LARRY]

BAIL SHOULD BE $50,000,000 THIS GUY IS THE LOWEST OF THE LOWEST

[Joan]

Larry..................I agree. He is a slime ball!

[wheezie]

Well, if he can raise the bail money, it should go to the Rodmans and his a@@ should sit in jail.

[Deleted]

[quote author=wheezie
Well, if he can raise the bail money, it should go to the Rodmans and his a@@ should sit in jail.[/quote]

you mean the goldmans dont you -- usually you dont have to put all the bail money up --- a bondsman will post the bail for you and you give him 10% or so and or a good collateral

[Deleted]

I was hoping that it would be much higher. Now for the Goldman's it is coming across that they are gold diggers. I think that they should be compensated for the loss of a son & brother, but all you every hear from them is $$$$$$$$$$$$.
I hope if they get some $$$$$$$$$$$$ they give some to charity in their son's/brother's name.

[Deleted]

[quote author=phyllis
. Now for the Goldman's it is coming across that they are gold diggers. I think that they should be compensated for the loss of a son & brother, but all you every hear from them is $$$$$$$$$$$$.
.[/quote]

what other form of compensation would you suggest

[wheezie]

wheezie said:

Well, if he can raise the bail money, it should go to the Rodmans and his a@@ should sit in jail.

Duh!! There I go again. Of course I meant the Goldmans - and the damn 10% or 20% should go there if he has it. He should eat cat food and send them all his money, instead we see him at fancy clubs with pretty girls and always a drink in his hand.

[Deleted]

i agree with you wheezie --- dont worry some day somewhere someone will judge him and he will have to pap the piper

[Deleted]

lougee1043 said:

[quote author=phyllis
. Now for the Goldman's it is coming across that they are gold diggers. I think that they should be compensated for the loss of a son & brother, but all you every hear from them is $$$$$$$$$$$$.
.

what other form of compensation would you suggest[/quote]
Lou, I just don't understand how he was held accountable in a civil suit when he was acquitted. Explain it to me. The same thing goes for Robert Blake. How does that work.

BTW: No amount of money will bring him or Nicole back.

[Fran Gyomory]

There is no compensation but guys like OJ, money talks and he hates the idea of giving the Goldman's anything. Thus, the appropriate thing to hurt him is to take his money.

Don't you think that he should hurt in some way Lou?

Phyllis, civil suits have different requirements for accountability. A criminal trial insists on there being NO REASONABLE DOUBT that the party is guilty. In a civil suit, the preponderence of the evidence needs to show that the party was in a position to have committed the crime. Of course, there is a much more formal and legal way of saying it, but this kind of shows how the two different trials can have different outcomes.

[Deleted]

frangyomory said:

There is no compensation but guys like OJ, money talks and he hates the idea of giving the Goldman's anything. Thus, the appropriate thing to hurt him is to take his money.

Don't you think that he should hurt in some way Lou?

Phyllis, civil suits have different requirements for accountability. A criminal trial insists on there being NO REASONABLE DOUBT that the party is guilty. In a civil suit, the preponderence of the evidence needs to show that the party was in a position to have committed the crime. Of course, there is a much more formal and legal way of saying it, but this kind of shows how the two different trials can have different outcomes.

Thank you

[Deleted]

fran said it much better then i ever could

according to the tv tonite the goldmans have collected less then 10 thou on a 33 mil judgemenjt

there is also talk that oj might have some hidden offshore accts